Fear Factor:
Security in a New Age A recent article in BusinessWeek
describes how designing in a post 9/11 world has forced architects
and planners of public spaces to revisit some basic tenets and
beliefs.
Poor Big
Brother. George Orwell's famous symbol of intrusive security has
acquired some frighteningly absurd lines in our time. Gone are "War
Is Peace," "Freedom Is Slavery," and "Ignorance Is Strength."
Instead we have warnings like "Do not iron clothes on body,"
"Caution, hot beverages are hot," "Remove occupants from stroller
before folding," and "Do not attempt to stop chainsaw blade with
hands."
In a world of
many wars and innumerable threats, twenty-first-century security has
surrounded us with warnings and checkpoints, routinely herding us
into single-file lines with concrete Jersey barriers, steel
barricades, and yellow tape — all under the watchful eyes of those
who search us for bombs and weapons.
Concern for
security in a suddenly uncertain age has certainly reshaped
psychology, politics, and design in America, but it has undoubtedly
had the most direct impact on architecture. For any public space,
security has become a complex, layered concept that covers detailed
blast specifications of window glass as well as issues of controlled
access, electronic passkey systems, street-level vehicle barriers,
and exterior surveillance.
"We need public
spaces for a new era, and they cannot be fortresses," says federal
judge Michael Hogan, whose new home, the Wayne Lyman Morse United
States Courthouse in Eugene, Oregon, is not a fortress. It is an
open, glassy, brilliantly lit reimagination of the public square for
a new century, designed by Pritzker laureate Thom Mayne of
Morphosis.
In
architecturally challenging Manhattan, you can see some of the
best-designed security solutions — and also some of the worst.
What's the right balance? See the complete article.
|